The very able Senator from Illinois, in the course of debate in the Senate, offered a better bill, which I was very pleased to support. That bill would have been a very significant and substantial step forward. Among other things, it did not have this ``donut'' in coverage that is in this bill. As I understand this bill, at a certain point--I think $22.50 in drug cost--and beyond that, up to $3,600, the burden falls back on individuals; is that correct?
John Sarbanes: “The very able Senator from Illinois, in the course of debate in the Senate, offered a better bill, which I was very…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a proposed healthcare bill and its coverage issues during Senate debate.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Let me go back to the 60-minute limit, because my understanding is that teens can pretty easily bypass the notification to continue using the app if they want to.
These are successes that are going to create new jobs. They are going to strengthen our domestic clean energy production.
Due to testing positive for COVID-19 and following recommended isolation protocols, I was unable to vote today. Had I been present, I would have voted ``nay'' on rollcall no. 122, ``nay'' on rollcall no. 123, and ``nay'' on rollcall no…
The more time that middle and high schoolers spend on social media, the evidence is, the more likely they are to experience depression and anxiety.





