There is a subheading called ``The Farce is With Us.'' It was, if you believe the official story, a case of farce majeure: House Republican leaders had to call off Thursday's planned vote on the budget resolution because two pages that were supposed to be in the document were accidentally omitted. . . . Whatever really happened, the fundamental cause of the mishap was that the Republican leadership was trying to pull a fast one--to rush through a huge tax cut before anyone had a chance to look at the details. Krugman, in this column, goes on to talk about, in effect, other missing pages in the budget document. Now we have had a little chance to look at the details, and I want to ask the ranking member, my good friend from North Dakota, a couple of questions. First, on defense, am I correct in understanding that the way this document is drawn, there is a blank check for a defense figure that will be filled in later? Is there a defense number coming later that will simply be slugged into the budget?
John Sarbanes: “There is a subheading called ``The Farce is With Us.'' It was, if you believe the official story, a case of farce…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing issues with the budget resolution and defense funding during a House floor debate.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
It's a national environmental treasure. It's a regional economic engine. It's been one of my top priorities since I've come to Congress.
If we have a better understanding of these factors, we can address them more effectively, which will, in turn, improve patient access and care overall.
The goal was not to federalize elections across the country; the goal was to set some uniform standards.
Due to testing positive for COVID-19 and following recommended isolation protocols, I was unable to vote today. Had I been present, I would have voted ``nay'' on rollcall no. 122, ``nay'' on rollcall no. 123, and ``nay'' on rollcall no…





