Very briefly, if we were seeking to leave the consumer or the user of the credit union exactly in the posture in which they now find themselves prior to the Supreme Court decision, we would have no limitation on credit union business lending, because that was the existing state of affairs. So in that sense, the problem of an issue was raised. There was an effort to respond to that problem. But if one is to use the argument that all we should do in this legislation is to return to the status quo--that that is the whole purpose of the legislation--then we have no limitation, because the status quo was without limitation.
John Sarbanes: “Very briefly, if we were seeking to leave the consumer or the user of the credit union exactly in the posture in which…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a Supreme Court decision on credit union business lending.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Without the strong and continued investment the EPA has requested for the Chesapeake Bay Program in fiscal year 2024, the risk is we could jeopardize decades of work in collaboration towards the Bay's restoration.
But these are dramatic changes that can bring us to a new place and, I think, have given many people a sense of hope instead of despair in the face of what we are seeing with a warming planet.
Congress gave EPA this role more than 50 years ago under the Clean Air Act and reaffirmed that responsibility in 2005 under the Energy Policy Act.
It is important to be clear that EPA's proposed standards are reasonable, performance-based emissions standards and constitute neither a national electric vehicle mandate nor an internal combustion ban.





