the issue before us is a resolution that has been reported from the Rules Committee, introduced by Senator D'Amato, the chairman of the Special Whitewater Committee, which would indefinitely extend the special committee and provide another $600,000 over and above the almost million dollars that was provided last year for it to continue its work. The distinguished minority leader, Senator Daschle, has proposed that the committee's work continue until the 3rd of April with an additional $185,000. The question is really whether the life of this committee ought to be given an indefinite extension throughout the 1996 Presidential election year. I am going to retrace the history of our inquiry with respect to this particular issue, because I am very frank to say that I think the indefinite extension of the work of this committee will only result in politicizing the committee. It will be increasingly perceived by the public as an investigation being conducted for political purposes.
John Sarbanes: “the issue before us is a resolution that has been reported from the Rules Committee, introduced by Senator D'Amato, the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the indefinite extension of the Special Whitewater Committee during Senate debate.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding her time. I thank Chair Westerman and his staff for working with Congressman Mfume and the whole Maryland delegation over the last few months. It has been a pleasure. I appreciate very much the work to…
I thank the ranking member for yielding. Mr. Chair, I rise in strong opposition to this bill. Today, we are arguing about a proposed Department of Energy efficiency standard for stoves, not just gas stoves, but every sort of kitchen stove…
Thank you very much. And I appreciate you talking about the data, the importance of collecting information on where the shortages are.
the majority of Americans agree that climate change needs to be addressed now--not 10 years from now or 100 years from now, but now.





