Thirdly, I just make this observation. We are allowing FDIC institutions to do this. But, of course, in a sense, that creates an extra exposure that one of these institutions would not have because the Government, the taxpayer, would be exposed on the loan guarantee. But, in addition, if the institution itself were to run into serious trouble, there would be taxpayer exposure on the Federal deposit insurance for the depositors of that institution. Is that correct?
John Sarbanes: “Thirdly, I just make this observation. We are allowing FDIC institutions to do this. But, of course, in a sense, that…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of loan guarantees for FDIC institutions.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
I thank the chairman for yielding and recognizing me. Madam Chair, I rise in strong opposition to the Republicans' energy bill. I have deep concerns about this package overall in terms of its attack on our bedrock environmental laws. As a…
Due to testing positive for COVID-19 and following recommended isolation protocols, I was unable to vote. Had I been present, I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No. 125, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 126, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 127, ``aye''…
Without the strong and continued investment the EPA has requested for the Chesapeake Bay Program in fiscal year 2024, the risk is we could jeopardize decades of work in collaboration towards the Bay's restoration.
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding me time. Mr. Chair, I rise with respect to an amendment that I introduced with Congressman Bilirakis that has already been made part of the en bloc, which has been agreed to. I am very appreciative of…





