Thirdly, I just make this observation. We are allowing FDIC institutions to do this. But, of course, in a sense, that creates an extra exposure that one of these institutions would not have because the Government, the taxpayer, would be exposed on the loan guarantee. But, in addition, if the institution itself were to run into serious trouble, there would be taxpayer exposure on the Federal deposit insurance for the depositors of that institution. Is that correct?
John Sarbanes: “Thirdly, I just make this observation. We are allowing FDIC institutions to do this. But, of course, in a sense, that…”
On the recordMarch 30, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of loan guarantees for FDIC institutions.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Jun 21, 2023
It is important to be clear that EPA's proposed standards are reasonable, performance-based emissions standards and constitute neither a national electric vehicle mandate nor an internal combustion ban.
Oct 17, 2023
I hope that today's hearing is the first step in continuing that legacy of strong bipartisan support for the Chesapeake Bay in this Congress.
Apr 25, 2023
But these are dramatic changes that can bring us to a new place and, I think, have given many people a sense of hope instead of despair in the face of what we are seeing with a warming planet.
Oct 17, 2023
We would like to thank Rep. Sarbanes for introducing this important piece of bipartisan legislation





