Any fundamental reorganization represents a huge managerial undertaking, one that becomes ever more daunting as the number of agencies to be included increases. The danger is that top managers will be preoccupied for months, if not years, with getting the reorganization right, thus giving insufficient attention to their real job, taking concrete action to counter the terrorist threat at home. This Brookings report advocated some consolidation of agencies, but it proposed a much smaller, more streamlined consolidation, and the report went on to say: ``Reorganization is not a panacea. In fact, there is a risk that reorganization could interfere with, rather than enhance, homeland security tasks.'' Certainly, changes should be made only when there is a compelling case that consolidation offers clear benefits.
John Sarbanes: “Any fundamental reorganization represents a huge managerial undertaking, one that becomes ever more daunting as the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of agency reorganization for homeland security.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Due to testing positive for COVID-19 and following recommended isolation protocols, I was unable to vote. Had I been present, I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No. 125, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 126, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 127, ``aye''…
I do also want to commend my colleague, Representative Blunt Rochester, for the work that she has been doing.
A strong, well-trained workforce is critical to ensuring a high-quality healthcare delivery system.
I have to say when we passed that Inflation Reduction Act, it was the first time in a long time that I did not feel powerless or feel that we were powerless in the face of climate change coming at us.





