On the recordFebruary 26, 2003
At a minimum. Of course, that was assuming we would not have this kind of devastation out there that might be possible if the weapons of mass destruction were to be utilized.
Source
govinfo.govJohn Sarbanes: “At a minimum. Of course, that was assuming we would not have this kind of devastation out there that might be possible…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the potential consequences of weapons of mass destruction.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Dec 3, 2024
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding her time. I thank Chair Westerman and his staff for working with Congressman Mfume and the whole Maryland delegation over the last few months. It has been a pleasure. I appreciate very much the work to…
Apr 25, 2023
As the Inflation Reduction Act reforms continue to be implemented over the coming years, we must continue to build on this success.
Jun 21, 2023
Congress gave EPA this role more than 50 years ago under the Clean Air Act and reaffirmed that responsibility in 2005 under the Energy Policy Act.
Oct 17, 2023
The health of the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed can only continue to improve through robust Federal, state, and local partnerships.
Other voices in this conversation
