On the recordFebruary 26, 2003
At a minimum. Of course, that was assuming we would not have this kind of devastation out there that might be possible if the weapons of mass destruction were to be utilized.
Source
govinfo.govJohn Sarbanes: “At a minimum. Of course, that was assuming we would not have this kind of devastation out there that might be possible…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the potential consequences of weapons of mass destruction.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Oct 17, 2023
This bill takes important steps to support the ongoing restoration of the Chesapeake Bay by reauthorizing NOAA's Chesapeake Bay Office and authorizing the agency's long-running Bay Watershed Education and Training, or B-WET Grant program.
Apr 26, 2023
The goal was not to federalize elections across the country; the goal was to set some uniform standards.
Oct 17, 2023
We would like to thank Rep. Sarbanes for introducing this important piece of bipartisan legislation
Jun 21, 2023
Congress gave EPA this role more than 50 years ago under the Clean Air Act and reaffirmed that responsibility in 2005 under the Energy Policy Act.
Other voices in this conversation
