I say to my colleague, as I understand it, this is what transpired. The 1995 act was being interpreted at the district court level, the Federal district court level--the legislative history of it--that the act's pleading standards eliminated liability for reckless conduct. Now, the SEC has come to us and said we should codify a reckless conduct right of action into the Federal standard. The legislation before us does not have such a codification. Now, there is language in the report, but we do not have a codification. So you have the problem about the legislative history for the 1998 act. And it is not quite clear to me how it will supplant the legislative history for the 1995 act. A codification would do that but that is not in this bill.
John Sarbanes: “I say to my colleague, as I understand it, this is what transpired. The 1995 act was being interpreted at the district…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the 1995 act and the need for codification in the 1998 legislation.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Thank you very much. And I appreciate you talking about the data, the importance of collecting information on where the shortages are.
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding me time. Mr. Chair, I rise with respect to an amendment that I introduced with Congressman Bilirakis that has already been made part of the en bloc, which has been agreed to. I am very appreciative of…
I thank Congressman Mfume for organizing this very important and special tribute. It is a tribute, as you have already heard, to the six hardworking men who lost their lives during this collapse of the bridge on March 26. They got up that…
Without the strong and continued investment the EPA has requested for the Chesapeake Bay Program in fiscal year 2024, the risk is we could jeopardize decades of work in collaboration towards the Bay's restoration.





