There is a direct connection. These large tax cuts that primarily benefit very wealthy people-- there is some benefit for others, no question. Most of the benefits go right up to the top group in society by income and wealth. They say we are running deficits, so to cover the deficits they have to use up the Social Security surplus. Then they say to correct the using up of the Social Security surplus, we have to cut Social Security benefits. It must be understood, these things are linked. The reason they have the deficit which now says they must cut Social Security benefits is because they gave the very large tax cuts to the elite, producing the deficit, which resulted in drawing down the Social Security surplus which then leads them to say, we have to cut the Social Security benefits. These are choices. This administration has made a choice. The choice the administration has made is to put tax cuts for the elite ahead of sustaining Social Security benefits.
John Sarbanes: “There is a direct connection. These large tax cuts that primarily benefit very wealthy people-- there is some benefit…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of tax cuts on Social Security benefits during a floor speech.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
I have to say when we passed that Inflation Reduction Act, it was the first time in a long time that I did not feel powerless or feel that we were powerless in the face of climate change coming at us.
Congressman Blunt Rochester and I again have led a letter this year to the House Appropriations Committee requesting $11 million for the National Center on Health Workforce Analysis.
I was unable to vote today. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 272, H.R. 1606; and ``yea'' on rollcall No. 273, H.R. 3672. personal explanation
each of which--each of which--would hamper EPA's ability to regulate air pollution and, unfortunately, continues this Republican agenda of putting Big Oil interests over the interests of the public.





