Calming down frenzy for a big federal tax cut. Congress should take a close look at Bush's forecast figures and a decidedly cautious approach. They quote the Comptroller General from his testimony before our committee where he said that: 'No one should design tax or spending policy pegged to the precise numbers in any 10-year forecast'--exactly the point that the able Senator made at the outset of his statement. And they conclude: 'Mr. Bush has raised expectations, but Congress still must carefully examine every aspect of this major proposal. We all want smaller tax bills, but only if they are reasonable and responsible.' Reasonable and responsible--and, as the Senator has pointed out, in the context of dealing with these basic needs: Education, infrastructure, defense. This administration has already sent the signal that they are going to want a major step up in defense and of course, reserving a significant amount of the surplus to pay down the debt. When are we going to pay off the debt, if we don't do it when we are running large surpluses and are at a 4.2 percent unemployment rate? We have a strong economy now. We don't want to risk the chance of knocking it off the track. The Washington Post had an editorial entitled 'Fiscal Souffle.' They conclude it by saying: A rush to commit too much of the projected surplus could take the country back to borrow and spend, just as the last big tax cut did 20 years ago.
John Sarbanes: “Calming down frenzy for a big federal tax cut. Congress should take a close look at Bush's forecast figures and a…”
On the recordFebruary 7, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for caution regarding federal tax cuts and budget surpluses.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Apr 25, 2023
Maryland's total-cost-of-care model also allows our State to invest in other health system goals, like lowering the maternal mortality rate and the opioid overdose mortality rate.
Jun 21, 2023
Congress gave EPA this role more than 50 years ago under the Clean Air Act and reaffirmed that responsibility in 2005 under the Energy Policy Act.
Mar 29, 2023
I thank the chairman for yielding and recognizing me. Madam Chair, I rise in strong opposition to the Republicans' energy bill. I have deep concerns about this package overall in terms of its attack on our bedrock environmental laws. As a…





