the managers' amendment consists of provisions intended to clarify, correct, and improve the bill. Section 211: This provision amends the term ``interested party'' in Section 211 (foreign availability and mass market status) to ensure its consistency with terms used in the rest of the bill. Sections 205, 302, and 307 all refer to ``interested person(s)''. The managers' amendment corrects the references in Section 211 by replacing ``interested party'' with ``interested person''. Sections 214 and 701: This provision clarifies the duties of the Office of Technology Evaluation. Section 214 of the bill establishes an Office of Technology Evaluation to analyze information and provide assessments for use in export control policy. The managers' amendment clarifies that when assessing the effect of foreign competition on critical US industrial sectors, the Office is to consider imports of manufactured goods. It also modifies Section 701 (annual report) to ensure that the Commerce Department's annual report to Congress includes a description of such assessments. The managers worked closely with Senator Hollings to include this provision. Section 311: The next provision modifies Section 311 (crime control instruments). Section 311 preserves authority contained in existing law (Section 6(n) of the Export Administration Act of 1979) to ensure that crime control and detection instruments and equipment may be exported only subject to an export license.
John Sarbanes: “the managers' amendment consists of provisions intended to clarify, correct, and improve the bill. Section 211: This…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing amendments to a bill related to export control policy and technology evaluation.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
This is an important function that our committee plays. We take it seriously.
I thank Congressman Mfume for organizing this very important and special tribute. It is a tribute, as you have already heard, to the six hardworking men who lost their lives during this collapse of the bridge on March 26. They got up that…
They want to be on the field of their democracy. They want to feel like they have some power within their own democracy.
each of which--each of which--would hamper EPA's ability to regulate air pollution and, unfortunately, continues this Republican agenda of putting Big Oil interests over the interests of the public.





