I commend again the able Senator from Michigan for this proposal that he has before us. The strength of the proposal, and the care with which it has been crafted, is made manifest by the tortured argument of the Senators from Connecticut and Arizona against his resolution. They are in a convoluted posture to try to misinterpret this in order to try to make an argument against it. It is just incredible what has happened. We need some intellectual integrity here as we deal with this issue. Let me ask the Senator from Michigan if he would answer a question or two. The Senator from Connecticut said earlier that you were precluding the use of military force to exercise our inherent right of self-defense because we would have to have a United Nations resolution before, as I understand--before--we could exercise such force. I read in your resolution a specific affirmation under international law of our inherent right to use military force; is that right?
John Sarbanes: “I commend again the able Senator from Michigan for this proposal that he has before us. The strength of the proposal…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a resolution related to military force and self-defense during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
We would like to thank Rep. Sarbanes for introducing this important piece of bipartisan legislation
If you concluded that putting some reasonable limits in place and trying to find a way to enforce them would lead some percentage of your users to leave TikTok and go somewhere else, is that something that you are prepared to accept?
Are you looking at ways to redesign core features like the ones I mentioned to be less manipulative--excuse me--and addictive for users, and can you commit to making some of those modifications here today?
I certainly support this legislation to pay tribute to the giant Elijah Cummings. I have so many memories of Elijah. The first memory I have is that we both represented Baltimore for many years together. I started to notice that he and I…





