Doesn't, in fact, this amendment undercut the consent decree? The consent decree leaves open, as I understand it, the possibility that the supervision of this election will be done by public funds. It does not say that it will be, but it leaves open that possibility. This amendment closes out that possibility. It closes out that possibility. That possibility was part of the consent decree. It was left to the judgment of the court whether, in fact, that remedy will be used. Is that not the case?
John Sarbanes: “Doesn't, in fact, this amendment undercut the consent decree? The consent decree leaves open, as I understand it, the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment on a consent decree related to election supervision.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
The goal was not to federalize elections across the country; the goal was to set some uniform standards.
It's a national environmental treasure. It's a regional economic engine. It's been one of my top priorities since I've come to Congress.
Without the strong and continued investment the EPA has requested for the Chesapeake Bay Program in fiscal year 2024, the risk is we could jeopardize decades of work in collaboration towards the Bay's restoration.
This bill takes important steps to support the ongoing restoration of the Chesapeake Bay by reauthorizing NOAA's Chesapeake Bay Office and authorizing the agency's long-running Bay Watershed Education and Training, or B-WET Grant program.





