On the recordMarch 12, 2019
Should they be signed into law, it is troubling that agency witnesses were not considered.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Concerned about the implications of legislation without agency input.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Jun 20, 2023
I was unable to vote today. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 272, H.R. 1606; and ``yea'' on rollcall No. 273, H.R. 3672. personal explanation
May 9, 2023
It's a national environmental treasure. It's a regional economic engine. It's been one of my top priorities since I've come to Congress.
Oct 17, 2023
I hope that today's hearing is the first step in continuing that legacy of strong bipartisan support for the Chesapeake Bay in this Congress.
May 9, 2023
Without the strong and continued investment the EPA has requested for the Chesapeake Bay Program in fiscal year 2024, the risk is we could jeopardize decades of work in collaboration towards the Bay's restoration.
Other voices in this conversation
