I was very careful to make the point that I supported this bill on the basis of my own judgment about its contents. I then went on to add the point that the administration was supportive of this bill, and obviously one finds some comfort in that since much of what is in the bill involves the executive branch making it work. So particularly on a bill such as this, if they were against it, that would give one pause for thought. I simply say to my colleague, it is a very interesting challenge he puts forward. Without anticipating that he would make such a challenge, I was very careful in my opening statement to make the point that my support for the bill was based on my own judgment about its provisions having worked through it very carefully. Over and above that judgment, I also, of course, alluded to the fact that the administration was very supportive of it.
John Sarbanes: “I was very careful to make the point that I supported this bill on the basis of my own judgment about its contents. I…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing support for a bill and the administration's backing during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
I hope that today's hearing is the first step in continuing that legacy of strong bipartisan support for the Chesapeake Bay in this Congress.
But these are dramatic changes that can bring us to a new place and, I think, have given many people a sense of hope instead of despair in the face of what we are seeing with a warming planet.
I was unable to vote today. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 272, H.R. 1606; and ``yea'' on rollcall No. 273, H.R. 3672. personal explanation
The health of the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed can only continue to improve through robust Federal, state, and local partnerships.





