So that $16 billion could have been taken and put directly to improve the benefit for our seniors, could it not?
John Sarbanes: “So that $16 billion could have been taken and put directly to improve the benefit for our seniors, could it not?”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the allocation of funds for senior benefits.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
It is important to be clear that EPA's proposed standards are reasonable, performance-based emissions standards and constitute neither a national electric vehicle mandate nor an internal combustion ban.
Each of which--each of which--would hamper EPA's ability to regulate air pollution and, unfortunately, continues this Republican agenda of putting Big Oil interests over the interests of the public.
This bill takes important steps to support the ongoing restoration of the Chesapeake Bay by reauthorizing NOAA's Chesapeake Bay Office and authorizing the agency's long-running Bay Watershed Education and Training, or B-WET Grant program.
We would like to thank Rep. Sarbanes for introducing this important piece of bipartisan legislation





