The Senator did this last night, and he is doing it again today. He has inserted into the authorization to use force pursuant to a U.N. resolution the word ``only.'' The word ``only'' is not there. These are two separate sections. One provides an authority under a U.N. resolution; the other preserves the inherent right of military--I want to say to my good friend from Connecticut, it is painful to me to see a former able and distinguished attorney general of the State of Connecticut twist and turn to try to do this, what he is trying to do, to the very well-crafted amendment of the Senator from Michigan. It is painful. It is painful to see this.
John Sarbanes: “The Senator did this last night, and he is doing it again today. He has inserted into the authorization to use force…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns over amendments related to U.N. authorization for military force.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
It's a national environmental treasure. It's a regional economic engine. It's been one of my top priorities since I've come to Congress.
They want to be on the field of their democracy. They want to feel like they have some power within their own democracy.
Each of which--each of which--would hamper EPA's ability to regulate air pollution and, unfortunately, continues this Republican agenda of putting Big Oil interests over the interests of the public.
Without the strong and continued investment the EPA has requested for the Chesapeake Bay Program in fiscal year 2024, the risk is we could jeopardize decades of work in collaboration towards the Bay's restoration.





