The bill has room in it for $726 billion worth of tax cuts. Obviously, this raises the question of priorities. Is it more important to give these particular tax cuts, which, of course, I believe strongly are heavily weighted towards the wealthy, as opposed to making some investment in programs of this sort? We have to connect the two. I am willing to look at doing reasonable tax cuts, but I think what is in the resolution, as the chairman knows from my statements in committee, is far too excessive. If it were up to me, I would reduce that amount. I would use a limited portion of it to fund some of these priority programs. I would use the remainder of it to hold down the deficit so we are not projecting such large deficits out into the future.
John Sarbanes: “The bill has room in it for $726 billion worth of tax cuts. Obviously, this raises the question of priorities. Is it…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing tax cuts and budget priorities during a floor speech.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
It is important to be clear that EPA's proposed standards are reasonable, performance-based emissions standards and constitute neither a national electric vehicle mandate nor an internal combustion ban.
I do also want to commend my colleague, Representative Blunt Rochester, for the work that she has been doing.
Due to testing positive for COVID-19 and following recommended isolation protocols, I was unable to vote. Had I been present, I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No. 125, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 126, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 127, ``aye''…
This bill takes important steps to support the ongoing restoration of the Chesapeake Bay by reauthorizing NOAA's Chesapeake Bay Office and authorizing the agency's long-running Bay Watershed Education and Training, or B-WET Grant program.





