The bill has room in it for $726 billion worth of tax cuts. Obviously, this raises the question of priorities. Is it more important to give these particular tax cuts, which, of course, I believe strongly are heavily weighted towards the wealthy, as opposed to making some investment in programs of this sort? We have to connect the two. I am willing to look at doing reasonable tax cuts, but I think what is in the resolution, as the chairman knows from my statements in committee, is far too excessive. If it were up to me, I would reduce that amount. I would use a limited portion of it to fund some of these priority programs. I would use the remainder of it to hold down the deficit so we are not projecting such large deficits out into the future.
John Sarbanes: “The bill has room in it for $726 billion worth of tax cuts. Obviously, this raises the question of priorities. Is it…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing tax cuts and budget priorities during a floor speech.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Without the strong and continued investment the EPA has requested for the Chesapeake Bay Program in fiscal year 2024, the risk is we could jeopardize decades of work in collaboration towards the Bay's restoration.
I hope that today's hearing is the first step in continuing that legacy of strong bipartisan support for the Chesapeake Bay in this Congress.
The health of the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed can only continue to improve through robust Federal, state, and local partnerships.
But these are dramatic changes that can bring us to a new place and, I think, have given many people a sense of hope instead of despair in the face of what we are seeing with a warming planet.





