Yes. The President could do that. Generally speaking, the President would use 212 and 213 in addressing foreign availability and mass marketing, because that is the process, as I spelled out, that has certain benefits that flow from its use. But he would not have to do that. He could invoke 201(d). That is why I said earlier in my opening statement that I thought this legislation gave very significant authorities to the President to make these judgments about national security and foreign policy interests, and it is one of the reasons that I think the administration, after very careful review of this legislation, is so supportive of it.
John Sarbanes: “Yes. The President could do that. Generally speaking, the President would use 212 and 213 in addressing foreign…”
On the recordSeptember 4, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing presidential authorities in relation to national security and foreign policy in proposed legislation.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Oct 17, 2023
I hope that today's hearing is the first step in continuing that legacy of strong bipartisan support for the Chesapeake Bay in this Congress.
Oct 17, 2023
This bill takes important steps to support the ongoing restoration of the Chesapeake Bay by reauthorizing NOAA's Chesapeake Bay Office and authorizing the agency's long-running Bay Watershed Education and Training, or B-WET Grant program.
Oct 17, 2023
We would like to thank Rep. Sarbanes for introducing this important piece of bipartisan legislation
Apr 26, 2023
The goal was not to federalize elections across the country; the goal was to set some uniform standards.





