The chairman corrects me and says ``more than a scintilla.'' I don't know how much more, but more than a scintilla. In any event, isn't it the case that no full hearings have been held on CRA? We come to the floor, and we get all of these assertions about abuses of one sort or another, sort of radical changes in a program that is seen as having been the lifeblood, enabling communities to renew themselves. To my knowledge, we have not had within the committee any sort of comprehensive hearings to examine those questions; is that the Senator's understanding?
John Sarbanes: “The chairman corrects me and says ``more than a scintilla.'' I don't know how much more, but more than a scintilla. In…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the lack of hearings on the Community Reinvestment Act during a Senate debate.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Congress gave EPA this role more than 50 years ago under the Clean Air Act and reaffirmed that responsibility in 2005 under the Energy Policy Act.
But these are dramatic changes that can bring us to a new place and, I think, have given many people a sense of hope instead of despair in the face of what we are seeing with a warming planet.
Each of which--each of which--would hamper EPA's ability to regulate air pollution and, unfortunately, continues this Republican agenda of putting Big Oil interests over the interests of the public.
The health of the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed can only continue to improve through robust Federal, state, and local partnerships.





