I say to my colleague we are just being given these kind of bland assurances. ``Surely this would happen. No question this would be done. It is common sense that we would respond.'' Yet I am giving you a real, live, historical example. There was nothing hypothetical about it, nothing conjectural about it. It happened at a critical time in American history. We were faced in the Congress with a very fateful decision. We are talking literally months before Pearl Harbor. Literally months. And the Congress was faced with this difficult decision. The Congress reacted, I think, appropriately. But by very narrow margins. And neither of the margins in the Senate nor the House are adequate to meet the requirements contained in your proposal, which only dramatizes the point that the Senator from West Virginia has made so effectively here this morning about the danger of going against the Founding Fathers, against Madison and Hamilton, and writing in these supermajority requirements. The real danger to the Republic is that you will not be able to deal with crisis situations when they emerge. The Senator says, ``Oh, no, we will take care of those. Do not worry about it. Do not worry about it. Surely we would respond.'' I am saying to the Senator: I am giving an example right out of history where we, under his standards, would not have taken care of it.…
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of supermajority requirements in Congress.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Due to testing positive for COVID-19 and following recommended isolation protocols, I was unable to vote. Had I been present, I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No. 125, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 126, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 127, ``aye''…
If you concluded that putting some reasonable limits in place and trying to find a way to enforce them would lead some percentage of your users to leave TikTok and go somewhere else, is that something that you are prepared to accept?
I thank Congressman Mfume for organizing this very important and special tribute. It is a tribute, as you have already heard, to the six hardworking men who lost their lives during this collapse of the bridge on March 26. They got up that…
It is important to be clear that EPA's proposed standards are reasonable, performance-based emissions standards and constitute neither a national electric vehicle mandate nor an internal combustion ban.





