I commend you for bringing out attention to Section 6 of the act that is under review here today because I agree with you that it creates a dangerous, it is a dangerous development to start putting aside the concerns about the science in developing the standards.
John Sarbanes: “I commend you for bringing out attention to Section 6 of the act that is under review here today because I agree with…”
Editor's note · Context
Sarbanes emphasizes the importance of science in environmental standards.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
This bill takes important steps to support the ongoing restoration of the Chesapeake Bay by reauthorizing NOAA's Chesapeake Bay Office and authorizing the agency's long-running Bay Watershed Education and Training, or B-WET Grant program.
Without the strong and continued investment the EPA has requested for the Chesapeake Bay Program in fiscal year 2024, the risk is we could jeopardize decades of work in collaboration towards the Bay's restoration.
Congress gave EPA this role more than 50 years ago under the Clean Air Act and reaffirmed that responsibility in 2005 under the Energy Policy Act.
The health of the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed can only continue to improve through robust Federal, state, and local partnerships.





