I just wanted to respond to this idea that the public wouldn't benefit from this. Yes, there are opportunities to develop more disclosure of this information to the public, and certainly the Democrats would like to see that. But the public would benefit from the IRS' getting more information about where this money comes from because it is the IRS' responsibility to determine whether these 501(c)(3) organizations are getting hijacked and taken over by special interest money--potentially foreign interest--and so forth. So the public would absolutely benefit if the IRS, which is the organization that has responsibility for determining whether you should have tax-exempt status or not, can fulfill that function on behalf of the public, and this would make it even more difficult for that agency to do its job in that respect.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Congressman Blunt Rochester and I again have led a letter this year to the House Appropriations Committee requesting $11 million for the National Center on Health Workforce Analysis.
If you concluded that putting some reasonable limits in place and trying to find a way to enforce them would lead some percentage of your users to leave TikTok and go somewhere else, is that something that you are prepared to accept?
If we have a better understanding of these factors, we can address them more effectively, which will, in turn, improve patient access and care overall.
I certainly support this legislation to pay tribute to the giant Elijah Cummings. I have so many memories of Elijah. The first memory I have is that we both represented Baltimore for many years together. I started to notice that he and I…





