Clearly what happens is that the actual contaminant level standard that gets set because of the feasibility analysis, that ends up typically being weaker than the goal.
John Sarbanes: “Clearly what happens is that the actual contaminant level standard that gets set because of the feasibility analysis…”
Editor's note · Context
Sarbanes expresses concern about drinking water standards being weaker than health goals due to feasibility analysis.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
They want to be on the field of their democracy. They want to feel like they have some power within their own democracy.
Each of which--each of which--would hamper EPA's ability to regulate air pollution and, unfortunately, continues this Republican agenda of putting Big Oil interests over the interests of the public.
The health of the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed can only continue to improve through robust Federal, state, and local partnerships.
It is important to be clear that EPA's proposed standards are reasonable, performance-based emissions standards and constitute neither a national electric vehicle mandate nor an internal combustion ban.





