First of all, I commend the able Senator from Nevada for an extremely fine statement in support of this amendment which I very strongly back. The Senator made reference--I think it is an extremely important point--to the fact that the decisions with respect to complying with CRA are made by the regulators. As I understand it, community groups or anyone else can come in and make comments when some of these steps are to be taken for which an institution would have to meet CRA muster, and some of those comments, I assume, can be right on point, others may wander about. But whatever the case, it is not the people who comment who make the judgment; it is the regulators who make the judgment. So they can take it into account, give it some weight, give it no weight-- isn't that correct?
John Sarbanes: “First of all, I commend the able Senator from Nevada for an extremely fine statement in support of this amendment which…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the role of regulators in the Community Reinvestment Act during Senate debate.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
I have to say when we passed that Inflation Reduction Act, it was the first time in a long time that I did not feel powerless or feel that we were powerless in the face of climate change coming at us.
A strong, well-trained workforce is critical to ensuring a high-quality healthcare delivery system.
Without the strong and continued investment the EPA has requested for the Chesapeake Bay Program in fiscal year 2024, the risk is we could jeopardize decades of work in collaboration towards the Bay's restoration.
Last year, as you know, Congress finally--finally, after many, many decades, really--took the historic step of standing up to Big Pharma and enacting policies that are already--we are seeing it--lowering healthcare costs for millions of…





