On the recordFebruary 16, 1995
That is right. You are saying if this amendment were passed, the August vote would have been negated.
Source
govinfo.govThat is right. You are saying if this amendment were passed, the August vote would have been negated.
Discussing the implications of an amendment during a legislative debate.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
I hope that today's hearing is the first step in continuing that legacy of strong bipartisan support for the Chesapeake Bay in this Congress.
They want to be on the field of their democracy. They want to feel like they have some power within their own democracy.
It is important to be clear that EPA's proposed standards are reasonable, performance-based emissions standards and constitute neither a national electric vehicle mandate nor an internal combustion ban.
The health of the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed can only continue to improve through robust Federal, state, and local partnerships.