And I understand that the terms of reference are such that it does not presuppose a particular substantive conclusion; it is, in effect, left open, or even level, however you want to describe it--a level playing field for FASB, the expert body that has been established to make these judgments to make its own independent judgment as to how these matters should be addressed, is that correct?
Discussing the terms of reference for the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) during a congressional session.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Each of which--each of which--would hamper EPA's ability to regulate air pollution and, unfortunately, continues this Republican agenda of putting Big Oil interests over the interests of the public.
They want to be on the field of their democracy. They want to feel like they have some power within their own democracy.
I hope that today's hearing is the first step in continuing that legacy of strong bipartisan support for the Chesapeake Bay in this Congress.
We would like to thank Rep. Sarbanes for introducing this important piece of bipartisan legislation
Other voices in this conversation
