According to a recent analysis from 1996 to 2000, Enron issued nearly $600 million in stock options, collecting tax deductions, which allowed the corporation to severely reduce their payment in taxes. According to reports that I think I have here, over $1 billion in stock options were issued to the senior executives of WorldCom. This is an important issue. I respect the views of my colleagues who disagree with my position and that of Mr. Greenspan, Mr. Stiglitz, and Mr. Buffett in various op-eds and editorials in newspapers throughout America. But why would we not vote on it? That is the question. Why would the distinguished Senator and friend from Nevada feel it incumbent upon himself to not allow a vote on stock options? I guess that question can be answered by observers. But here is the deal. I want to tell my friend from Nevada again, there will be a vote on how stock options are treated. I will repeat the amendment. I will repeat the amendment and will repeat it again several times before I finish discussing this issue. The issue, no matter how you feel, should be addressed.
John Sarbanes: “According to a recent analysis from 1996 to 2000, Enron issued nearly $600 million in stock options, collecting tax…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the treatment of stock options and the need for a vote on the issue.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
A strong, well-trained workforce is critical to ensuring a high-quality healthcare delivery system.
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding me time. Mr. Chair, I rise with respect to an amendment that I introduced with Congressman Bilirakis that has already been made part of the en bloc, which has been agreed to. I am very appreciative of…
This bill takes important steps to support the ongoing restoration of the Chesapeake Bay by reauthorizing NOAA's Chesapeake Bay Office and authorizing the agency's long-running Bay Watershed Education and Training, or B-WET Grant program.
each of which--each of which--would hamper EPA's ability to regulate air pollution and, unfortunately, continues this Republican agenda of putting Big Oil interests over the interests of the public.





