Now the consent decree remains silent on the question of a rerun of that election since it has not been certified. This amendment would, in effect, deprive the court of an option that is now available to it, an option that, in fact, was left open by the consent decree. This is simply undoing a consent decree. You will never get consent decrees. The Bush Administration held out the accomplishment of this consent decree as a major achievement, is that not correct?
John Sarbanes: “Now the consent decree remains silent on the question of a rerun of that election since it has not been certified. This…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to a consent decree.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
I certainly support this legislation to pay tribute to the giant Elijah Cummings. I have so many memories of Elijah. The first memory I have is that we both represented Baltimore for many years together. I started to notice that he and I…
Let me go back to the 60-minute limit, because my understanding is that teens can pretty easily bypass the notification to continue using the app if they want to.
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding her time. I thank Chair Westerman and his staff for working with Congressman Mfume and the whole Maryland delegation over the last few months. It has been a pleasure. I appreciate very much the work to…
They want to be on the field of their democracy. They want to feel like they have some power within their own democracy.





