I think the idea of a presidentially appointed independent advisory committee to review the matter and submit its findings to the Congress at an appropriate time is a good idea. It may well prove of significant benefit. I repeat what I said yesterday. I think all 100 Members of the Senate are concerned that our national security is effectively protected. I hope what we went over yesterday, provisions of the bill and some of the authority given to the President, provided some reassurance in terms of ultimate authority to act on behalf of important national security and foreign policy interests. I hope in the course of the day we can work through some of these matters and perhaps move to a conclusion. Again, I state my appreciation to the Senator for the questions he raised and focusing our attention on them. He has done that consistently as we have moved through the process. I know my very able colleague from Wyoming, Senator Enzi, has interacted throughout. What is before the Senate in this legislation has been shaped in part by questions and concerns the Senator has raised.
John Sarbanes: “I think the idea of a presidentially appointed independent advisory committee to review the matter and submit its…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing national security legislation and the role of an independent advisory committee.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Due to testing positive for COVID-19 and following recommended isolation protocols, I was unable to vote. Had I been present, I would have voted ``aye'' on rollcall No. 125, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 126, ``aye'' on rollcall No. 127, ``aye''…
Let me go back to the 60-minute limit, because my understanding is that teens can pretty easily bypass the notification to continue using the app if they want to.
I thank the ranking member for yielding. Mr. Chair, I rise in strong opposition to this bill. Today, we are arguing about a proposed Department of Energy efficiency standard for stoves, not just gas stoves, but every sort of kitchen stove…
the majority of Americans agree that climate change needs to be addressed now--not 10 years from now or 100 years from now, but now.





