as I have indicated earlier in the course of the opening debate on this issue, we are very anxious on our side to have financial service modernization legislation, and most of us subscribe to the proposition of allowing affiliations between banks, security firms, and insurance companies. However, as I have indicated, that is not the only issue before us. We have to consider that question in the context of addressing important questions of providing credit in all communities in our country; namely, the Community Reinvestment Act issue. We have to consider how these activities are to be done, whether they are to be done solely in an affiliate, outside of the banking structure, or whether banks will have the opportunity either to use the affiliate or to do it in an operating subsidiary. We have the important issue of the long historical separation between banking and commerce, which has prevailed in this country. And we have other aspects of the legislation which I think are of importance, including important provisions with respect to consumer protection.
John Sarbanes: “as I have indicated earlier in the course of the opening debate on this issue, we are very anxious on our side to have…”
On the recordMay 4, 1999
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing financial service modernization legislation and its implications for community credit and consumer protection.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Oct 17, 2023
I hope that today's hearing is the first step in continuing that legacy of strong bipartisan support for the Chesapeake Bay in this Congress.
Apr 26, 2023
The goal was not to federalize elections across the country; the goal was to set some uniform standards.
Apr 10, 2024
I thank Congressman Mfume for organizing this very important and special tribute. It is a tribute, as you have already heard, to the six hardworking men who lost their lives during this collapse of the bridge on March 26. They got up that…





