One of the difficulties I am having, as I hear the critics of this bill outline their concerns, I frequently find myself sharing their concerns but then not understanding why they fail to perceive the bill addresses their concerns. In other words, we have tried to cover this matter. The Senator from Arizona has spent a good deal of time talking about foreign availability but, in fact, the legislation specifically provides a whole procedure whereby the President can set aside a foreign availability status determination. That is in section 212. There is a detailed process by which he can set that aside. Furthermore, and much more importantly in a sense, in response to some of the points that were raised, we give the President in section 201(d) enhanced control authority. Let me read that authority: Notwithstanding any other provisions of this title, the President may determine that applying the provisions of section 204 or 211-- And 211 is the foreign availability mass marketing section-- with respect to any item on the National Security Control List would constitute a significant threat to the national security of the United States and that such item requires enhanced control.
John Sarbanes: “One of the difficulties I am having, as I hear the critics of this bill outline their concerns, I frequently find myself…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about a bill related to national security and foreign availability.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
But these are dramatic changes that can bring us to a new place and, I think, have given many people a sense of hope instead of despair in the face of what we are seeing with a warming planet.
The goal was not to federalize elections across the country; the goal was to set some uniform standards.
If you concluded that putting some reasonable limits in place and trying to find a way to enforce them would lead some percentage of your users to leave TikTok and go somewhere else, is that something that you are prepared to accept?
Congressman Blunt Rochester and I again have led a letter this year to the House Appropriations Committee requesting $11 million for the National Center on Health Workforce Analysis.





