H.R. 986 would designate 25.3 miles of the Eightmile River and its tributaries in Connecticut as a national scenic river. The bill was introduced by my friend and freshman class colleague, Representative Joe Courtney, who has been a strong and effective advocate of this designation. This legislation would protect portions of the Eightmile River that have been found to have 'outstandingly remarkable' values, including an intact watershed with a natural flow, very high water quality, unusual geological features, and large numbers of rare plants and animals. The bill would designate five segments of the river and its tributaries as scenic under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. The designated segments would be managed according to a plan produced pursuant to the 2001 Eightmile River Wild and Scenic River Study Act. The administration supports the bill, as we were told by a National Park Service witness at a hearing before the National Parks, Forests and Public Lands Subcommittee on April 17. In a draft study, the agency found these portions of the river and its tributaries to be eligible and suitable for designation. The bill is cosponsored by the entire Connecticut House delegation. Both Connecticut Senators support the designation, as does the Republican Governor of Connecticut. The bill also enjoys ample support from the local community, including the local governments of the towns of Salem, East Haddam and Lyme.
John Sarbanes: “H.R. 986 would designate 25.3 miles of the Eightmile River and its tributaries in Connecticut as a national scenic…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing H.R. 986 to designate parts of the Eightmile River in Connecticut as a national scenic river.
Share
More from John Sarbanes
Are you looking at ways to redesign core features like the ones I mentioned to be less manipulative--excuse me--and addictive for users, and can you commit to making some of those modifications here today?
Congress gave EPA this role more than 50 years ago under the Clean Air Act and reaffirmed that responsibility in 2005 under the Energy Policy Act.
TikTok itself has acknowledged that these features and others, like the endless scroll feature, can have an outsized effect on teens.
If you concluded that putting some reasonable limits in place and trying to find a way to enforce them would lead some percentage of your users to leave TikTok and go somewhere else, is that something that you are prepared to accept?





