On rollcall No.: 478--I would have voted ``no,'' 479--I would have voted ``no,'' 480--I would have voted ``no,'' 481--I would have voted ``no,'' 482--I would have voted ``no,'' 483--I would have voted ``no.'' Unfortunately, I had a serious medical family matter that required my attendance this morning. Had I been present, I would have voted ``no'' on rollcall vote No. 478. personal explanation
Share
More from John Delaney
I want to start by thanking the chairman and the ranking member for supporting this amendment, and I want to thank my colleague from California for giving me the opportunity to work with him on this amendment. Mr. Chairman, the reason I…
I want to thank the gentlewoman for yielding me time. Mr. Chairman, during the financial crisis, 19 of the 20 largest financial institutions in the United States either required a bailout or a significant investment by the taxpayers…
That is precisely what this designation does, which is why so many Democrats supported this bill, because we believe, as do many of my Republican colleagues, that the mission of FSOC is worthy and that we should be empowering FSOC to do…
I think we need to find some way to tap into their energy and their intellectual capital in a way that helps us launch into the 21st century.
Other voices in this conversation
