Do you find some irony in the fact that we voted--or at least some people voted for a $1.5 trillion tax cut to the wealthiest interests in the country and then come back and complain about a $1.5 million increase to go after the corruption that exists in government?
Raskin highlights the contradiction in tax cuts for the wealthy versus funding for anti-corruption efforts.
Share
More from Jamie Raskin
[Y]our election as Fifa president was supposed to mark a red-card break from a decades-long culture of corruption and scandals that dressed down world soccer’s reputation.
The story is that he continues to lie about it, and they’ve organized an entire political party, albeit a dwindling and shrinking one, around a lie.
With control of the House, we can call hearings, conduct depositions, use subpoenas to compel the appearance of witnesses and the production of documents, if necessary, and pass bills that root out corruption to make sure the government is…
Other voices in this conversation
