Jamie Raskin actually said...

"What does that say to the parties before them?"

"But what the Supreme Court has said is that this is an objective test, not a question of subjective introspection and will on the part of the particular judge."

"It's their ability to influence the other justices as well, which is so problematic."

"the ABA ethics rules governing recusal... specify that justices must pay attention both to the reality and the appearance of their spouse's potential financial and personal conflicts of interests, as ..."