That is the way it has been changed. It has been altered to that. When you introduced it, it required a conviction. I am just wondering: What was your original logic, and why did you change your mind about that, if you did? Maybe you didn't.
Questioning changes made to a legislative proposal regarding conviction requirements.
Share
More from Jamie Raskin
But the good news is that the vast majority of Americans across the political spectrum are standing up for our democracy and our freedom in our free and fair elections.
They are determined to compensate Trump’s private street-fighting militia and create 1,600 MAGA Millionaires with our money.
“In every other part of the federal government, taking lavish gifts from interested parties is called corruption—but at the Supreme Court, it’s bizarrely been treated as a job perk.
Other voices in this conversation
