Political Quotes

On the recordMarch 8, 2023
I just want to echo the very important point you just made. We have a sequence of trivial amendments that have been added by the majority, and they refuse to consider what I think is the central amendment that this legislation would need in order for it not to be an utter disaster for America if this legislation were to pass. Now, they concede implicitly by their legislation that there is a problem with saying we are not going to allow any government officials to get in touch with the social media, because they create an exception for certain things: for child pornography, for human trafficking, and for drug dealing. And I agree with all of those. But are those more important and more grave than the national security interests of the United States itself? What about assaults on our elections, which go right to the heart of national security? What about assaults on our energy security structure? What about assaults on our power structure? Not only do they not build that into their bill; they will not even allow us to put it on the floor for an open vote among all of our colleagues in Congress. Why won't they do that? Well, because if there is a national security exception to their Putin protection act, at that point, the exception swallows the rule, because the rule is let's let Putin and Xi and every autocrat, theocrat, and dictator on Earth run amuck on our social media and not allow our government officials to say anything about it.…
Said by
Jamie Raskin
Democratic · Maryland
Source
govinfo.gov
Mar 8, 2023

Share

More from Jamie Raskin

Aug 16, 2026

“It’s a smash-and-grab get-rich-quick scheme and they’re turning the White House into one large insider trading conspiracy,”

huffpost.com
Jul 24, 2026

It seems Republican Members of Congress are lashing out because they just realized their communications with the White House became presidential records preserved at the National Archives as required by the Presidential Records Act.

huffpost.com
Jul 16, 2026

“In every other part of the federal government, taking lavish gifts from interested parties is called corruption—but at the Supreme Court, it’s bizarrely been treated as a job perk.

lujan.senate.gov
Aug 10, 2026

We need a DOJ committed to the rule of law, not the corrupt rule of a kleptocrat.

newhampshirebulletin.com

Other voices in this conversation