If there is substantial factual predicate for obstruction of justice or witness tampering, we will take appropriate legal measures at that point.
Jamie Raskin: “If there is substantial factual predicate for obstruction of justice or witness tampering, we will take appropriate…”
Editor's note · Context
Raskin discusses the committee's potential actions regarding obstruction of justice.
Share
More from Jamie Raskin
From Frederick Douglass to Harriet Tubman to Rachel Carson to Thurgood Marshall, Marylanders have been devoted patriots and fighters for our land, our democracy and our freedom. When this time capsule is opened, future Americans will be…
But stealing taxpayer dollars to pay for Mr. Trump’s narcissistic ego trips is plainly illegal.
When this time capsule is opened, future Americans will be reminded of the Free State’s many enduring cultural, scientific and political contributions to our nation’s history.
It is blatantly unethical under numerous federal ethics provisions proscribing the use of government resources for political campaigns.





