for cause protections were unconstitutional.
Editor's note · Context
Raskin's assertion reflects Trump's Justice Department's stance on removal protections.
Share & report
More from Jamie Raskin
I include in the Record ``The Lost History of the `Universal' Injunction,'' a law review article by Mila Sohoni refuting what was just stated by the gentleman. The universal injunction, the nationwide injunction, goes back at least to 1913…
Unfortunately, this is yet another example of the Trump DOJ allowing criminals to go free — whether they assaulted police officers, sold drugs to the community, or are corrupt politicians — as long as the criminals pledge loyalty to…
The link to the entire document can be found here: https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/920- 1009__Online.pdf. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the distinguished gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Johnson), the ranking member…
By threatening to seek costs and damages from private litigants, Donald Trump is trying to scare Americans out of court.





