Had I been present, I would have voted ``nay'' on rollcall No. 56. personal explanation
Share & report
More from Jamie Raskin
The American people and the Congress deserve complete transparency into Trump’s assault on free speech, the right to counsel, due process and access to courts.
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 264, nays 155, not voting 14, as follows: [Roll No. 42] YEAS--264 Aderholt Alford Allen Amodei (NV) Arrington…
Are you ready to fight back? Do you want a gangster state or do you want free speech in America?
I include in the Record ``The Lost History of the `Universal' Injunction,'' a law review article by Mila Sohoni refuting what was just stated by the gentleman. The universal injunction, the nationwide injunction, goes back at least to 1913…





