the census has counted all persons, right, and the administration's attempt to try to impose a citizenship question even was invalidated by a Supreme Court
Editor's note · Context
Raskin highlights the Supreme Court's ruling against the citizenship question in the census.
Share
More from Jamie Raskin
“In every other part of the federal government, taking lavish gifts from interested parties is called corruption—but at the Supreme Court, it’s bizarrely been treated as a job perk.
But success on the merits is not the goal. It is meant to harass Jack Smith. It is meant to please their Fox News viewership. It is meant to whitewash their own participation in a scheme to overthrow our elections.
[Y]our election as Fifa president was supposed to mark a red-card break from a decades-long culture of corruption and scandals that dressed down world soccer’s reputation.
The most recent quid pro quo that Fifa and President Trump orchestrated is not a victimless crime. It hurts Americans.





