On the recordJune 2, 2014
Of course not. The first thing we have to remark is that the Citizens United case did not endow a single individual with any right to speak that he or she did not already have.
Source
congress.govOf course not. The first thing we have to remark is that the Citizens United case did not endow a single individual with any right to speak that he or she did not already have.
Raskin clarifies that Citizens United did not create new speech rights.
Share
More from Jamie Raskin
The most recent quid pro quo that Fifa and President Trump orchestrated is not a victimless crime. It hurts Americans.
“In every other part of the federal government, taking lavish gifts from interested parties is called corruption—but at the Supreme Court, it’s bizarrely been treated as a job perk.