But it has never been the understanding of any Congress, whether it was the Congress--the House of Representatives that impeached Bill Clinton or the House of Representatives that brought articles against Richard Nixon or back to Andrew Johnson that you need first to prove a statutory offense before the House gets to move Articles of Impeachment.
On the recordDecember 16, 2019
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Raskin argues that impeachment does not require proof of a statutory offense.
Share
More from Jamie Raskin
Jun 26, 2026
The people’s representatives must decide whether to uphold the rule of law and protect taxpayer dollars – or stand aside as this unprecedented corruption spins out of control.
Aug 12, 2026
At a minimum, it appears that members of the Trump Administration were ready and willing to imprison an innocent American for a decade in a desperate effort to soothe an ex-landlord’s wounded ego about a terrible paint job and wasteful…
Jul 24, 2026
But success on the merits is not the goal. It is meant to harass Jack Smith. It is meant to please their Fox News viewership. It is meant to whitewash their own participation in a scheme to overthrow our elections.





