especially when paired with his troubling past partisan ideological activity in favor of Trump, Justice Alito's decision to have a personal phone call with President Trump—who obviously has an active and deeply personal matter before the court—makes clear that he fundamentally misunderstands the basic requirements of judicial ethics or, more likely, believes himself to be above judicial ethics altogether.
Editor's note · Context
Raskin criticizes Alito's call with Trump as a violation of judicial ethics.
Share
More from Jamie Raskin
These hollow words are an affront to the American people, Congress and the courts, and are clearly designed to lull Senators Cornyn and Tillis into a false sense that their legitimate concerns have been addressed while leaving Blanche’s…
With control of the House, we can call hearings, conduct depositions, use subpoenas to compel the appearance of witnesses and the production of documents, if necessary, and pass bills that root out corruption to make sure the government is…
“It’s a smash-and-grab get-rich-quick scheme and they’re turning the White House into one large insider trading conspiracy,”
The most recent quid pro quo that Fifa and President Trump orchestrated is not a victimless crime. It hurts Americans.





