It's a ridiculous motion and a ridiculous decision. You know, it's really the first time in American history that someone's been held in contempt by the U.S. Congress for complying with a subpoena from Congress.
Jamie Raskin criticizes the decision to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt.
Share
More from Jamie Raskin
I felt my constituents had a right to know. I wanted to have that transparency. And I think it also gave me a tremendous amount of support.
“In every other part of the federal government, taking lavish gifts from interested parties is called corruption—but at the Supreme Court, it’s bizarrely been treated as a job perk.
Other voices in this conversation
