the old international dispute between Mexico and the United States over the U.S. 1972 Marine Mammal Protection Act which bans the use of tuna nets to catch dolphins has resulted in the European Community jumping into the dispute with charges of their own. The European Community is the winner and the United States and the dolphins are the losers with a GATT [General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade] dispute panel ruling the American ban illegal because GATT does not allow trade bans based on production methods. Production method is a fancy name for a net but, it still means that dolphins will be killed. Mexico originally complained to GATT and won a dispute panel ruling against the United States in 1991. The GATT panel determined that GATT barred any administrative law that attempts to regulate wildlife outside a nation's borders. Mexico, however, did not push the original GATT ruling according to the Wall Street Journal, because it feared the dispute would spoil Mexico's chances for Congressional approval for a North American Free- Trade Agreement [NAFTA]. Fortunately for the United States, the GATT ruling is just in time for Americans to discover how GATT really works before we vote on the GATT and the World Trade Organization.
Helen Bentley: “the old international dispute between Mexico and the United States over the U.S. 1972 Marine Mammal Protection Act which…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the GATT ruling on U.S. marine mammal protection and international trade.
Share
More from Helen Bentley
Nissan Motor Corp. in the United States recently announced a buy-back of their flawed 1987-1990 C-22 minivans and, the settlement of a 1-day California class action lawsuit which provides every van owner with a $500 coupon. What was not…
Canada may be our good northern neighbor, but it is not friendly in trade matters. The Journal of Commerce reports that last year, under the Canadian Free-Trade Agreement [CFTA], a five member dispute resolution panel overturned a 6.5…
Mr. Chairman, the time has come to pass a balanced budget amendment. Opponents say that the Constitution should not be trifled with, and that because we as a body have failed, we should not pass the buck to the Constitution. We also hear…
I first want to thank the gentleman from Kentucky for taking this time to pay tribute to one of the outstanding Members of this body. Mr. Speaker, the loss of our colleague, Bill Natcher, has diminished the effectiveness of this body by a…





