I have concerns about H.R. 1327 because I believe that genuine deficit reduction rather than tax cuts should be our No. 1 priority. But I really want to point out to this body that while purporting to decrease taxes, this bill actually raises taxes on over 2 million Americans. Mr. Speaker, title IV of this bill would raise Federal employee retirement contributions by 2.5 percent. It also would change the retirement formula to reflect the highest 5 years of salary instead of the current highest 3 years of salary. This change in retirement formula would affect postal employees as well as civil service workers. Why are we once again taxing a work force that has already contributed to deficit reduction for more than a decade? The tax bill that is before us contains $91 billion more than is needed to fund the tax cuts. The $12 billion from tax increases on Federal employees is not needed. Both the Congressional Research Service [CRS] and the General Accounting Office [GAO] agree that the 'Federal retirement system's unfunded liability is not a problem that needs to be fixed.' Both CRS and GAO conclude that 'there will always be sufficient assets in the retirement fund to cover benefit payments to all current and future retirees.' The provisions in title IV of H.R. 1237 were never approved by the Government Reform and Oversight Committee.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about H.R. 1327 and its impact on Federal employee taxes and retirement contributions.
Share
More from Connie Morella
I was going to mention that we are so very proud of a guy who is our role model, not only while he was in Congress as the minority leader, but since then he has come to every one of our meetings. He's been very actively involved, and I…
Thank you very much. Thank you, Dennis. This is a great surprise. It reminds me of something that Will Shakespeare--and I think really it was his wife who wrote it--who said: For these great blessings heaped upon me, I can nothing render…
Thank you, Leader Pelosi, for your inspiring words, for coming here to greet us, your former colleagues, and for explaining the initiative on jobs and elevating women. Leader Pelosi, I hope you noticed that this will be my last time as…
So you see, we are moving ahead. This association is progressive. So now back to our report. Our association is bipartisan. It was chartered by Congress in 1983. The purpose of the U.S. Association of Former Members of Congress is to…





