It is entirely wrong to call this an expansion of the Clean Water Act or a new regulation.
Editor's note · Context
Van Hollen defends the interpretation of the Clean Water Act as consistent.
Share & report
More from Chris Van Hollen
Mr. President, the bill that Senate Republicans have brought to the floor today and which we will vote on sometime soon is the latest example of the ``great betrayal'' in action. On the campaign trail, Candidate Donald Trump promised that…
I take this opportunity to remind the department of its legal obligation to notify the Senate and House Committees on Appropriations regarding the large-scale termination of employees.
I say it is time to delete DOGE. Please adopt the amendment. Thank you, my colleagues. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Iowa.
I ask for the yeas and nays. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second? There is a sufficient second. The clerk will call the roll. The legislative clerk called the roll. The result was announced--yeas 48, nays 52, as follows…





