Mr. Speaker, the truth is that the plea agreement entered into by Mr. Rota indicates that he will provide such information whenever and in whatever form the U.S. attorney's office shall reasonably request. The U.S. attorney's office is not going to let Mr. Rota testify with immunity before the Ethics Committee. We will have to grant immunity if we want him to testify. Twenty-six times during the Irangate Congress granted use immunity. If we grant use immunity, then the prosecutor, the U.S. attorney, must prove that any information that was obtained through the testimony of Mr. Rota was not used in bringing the criminal charges. It is an impossible burden. One thing we know about the Istook resolution, it requests the Ethics Commission to do something that the U.S. attorney's office says will severely risk the integrity of the criminal investigation.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of granting immunity to Mr. Rota in relation to an ongoing investigation.
Share
More from Ben Cardin
section 36(b) of the Arms Export Control Act requires that Congress receive prior notification of certain proposed arms sales as defined by that statute. Upon such notification, the Congress has 30 calendar days during which the sale may…
I come to the floor today to introduce the American Foreign Affairs Talent Expansion Act, or the American FATE Act, legislation that can serve as a blueprint for my colleagues who hope to promote diversity in diplomacy and development in…
It was originally a piece of legislation targeting the people who killed Sergei Magnitsky.
I ask unanimous consent that the committee-reported substitute amendment, where applicable, be agreed to; that the bills, as amended, if amended, be considered read a third time and passed; and that the motions to reconsider be considered…





